MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414582719 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.25.25336651

Fecal iron quantification in a randomized controlled trial of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> ATCC 202195 in newborns in Dhaka, Bangladesh

2025· preprint· en· W4414582719 on OpenAlexaff
Huma Qamar, Lisa G. Pell, Shafiqul Alam Sarker, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Rashidul Haque, Sharmin Akter, Shamima Sultana, Daniel Roth, Rubhana Raqib

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalIron deficiencyObservational studyFerritinBiomarker

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Probiotics may enhance host iron bioavailability, offering a strategy to address iron deficiency. Fecal iron may be a useful non-invasive biomarker of such effects in infants. Objective To examine the use of fecal iron quantification in a randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) of neonatal administration of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 202195 (LP202195), with or without fructooligosaccharide (FOS), in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Methods Fecal iron quantification using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) was optimized using standards and reference materials, and pilot-tested using pooled stool aliquots (n=32) from an observational cohort of young infants in Bangladesh (aged 0-64 days). The optimized AAS assay was then applied to individual stool samples collected at 14 days of age (n=307) in a RCT in which newborns aged 0-4 days were randomly allocated to one of five groups: placebo, 1-or 7-day regimens of LP202195, with or without FOS. Serum ferritin was measured at 2 months postnatal age (n=251). Effects of the 1-and 7-day LP202195 regimens were estimated using linear regression and expressed as mean percent differences relative to placebo, with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results The optimized AAS fecal iron assay had acceptable accuracy (91-99%), precision (within-and between-run coefficients of variation <10%), and recovery (93-112%), with a reportable range of 0.2 to 80 mg Fe per 100 g dry stool. In pooled samples from the observational cohort, fecal iron varied with age and feeding status. In the RCT, fecal iron concentrations did not significantly differ following1-day (% difference=9.8%, 95%CI:-19%, 49%; P=0.54) or 7-days (% difference=-6.1%, 95%CI:-31%, 28%; P=0.69) of LP202195 administration, versus placebo (geometric mean concentration=4.3mg Fe/100g dry stool (95%CI:3.3, 5.6); n=53). Inferences were unchanged when groups were disaggregated by FOS co-administration (P>0.05 for all). Similarly, there were no effects of LP202195 on serum ferritin at 2 months of age (P>0.05 for all). Conclusions Fecal iron quantification by AAS was valid and feasibly implemented in a trial of neonatal administration of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 202195. However, the assay is resource-intensive and may not be more informative than conventional measures of iron status when studying the effects of probiotics/synbiotics on iron bioavailability. Clinical Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05180201

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→