MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414584244 · doi:10.17498/kdeniz.1697617

IDEOLOGICAL DEBATES IN THE 19TH-CENTURY RUSSIAN EMPIRE

2025· article· en· W4414584244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKaradeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTurkish Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyState (computer science)PoliticsEmpireRussian cultureQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Decembrist Uprising of 1825 marked a pivotal event in the history of the Russian state. The developments of the first quarter of the 19th century - particularly the exposure to Western culture and its worldviews provoked significant intellectual activity within Russian society, especially among its intellectuals. Liberal principles originating from the West were increasingly articulated in public discourse. However, it cannot be claimed that the dissemination of liberal ideas was universally welcomed by all participants in these debates. On the contrary, among Russian thinkers and state authorities, some adhered to conservative views regarding the organization of the state and social life in the Russian Empire. This tension manifested both among the Decembrists, whose oppositional activities catalyzed further intellectual reflection, and in the works of subsequent representatives of ideological groups such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Slavophilism, and Westernism. All adherents of the aforementioned ideological currents upheld the necessity of establishing a state model which, while incorporating European experience, would not compromise Russian cultural distinctiveness. In this regard, the present study aimed to examine the impact of the events of the first quarter of the nineteenth century, in particular the European influence on ideological and political thought in the Russian Empire, as well as the attitude of Russian intellectual circles of that period toward this process. As references, the study employed not only the works of prominent thinkers and public figures, but also decrees issued by the highest state authorities, alongside contemporary Russian materials that reflect views on past events across the span of centuries. In addition, Turkish sources were referenced, which, relying on the works of the classics of Russian literature, likewise shed light on the problem addressed in this study. The outcome of the research was an understanding of the principal causes and driving forces behind the events of December 1825, the essence of the ideological and political dilemma, and the evolution of certain individuals’ views as the 20th century approached. Furthermore, in the concluding part of the work, an analogy was drawn with the ambivalence of reflections on the role and place of the Russian Federation in the global world after 1991.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it