Protecting nature: permanence of "ecological modernization" and social protests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div> Global strike for the climate, movement of "Gilets jaunes" in France for more social and environmental justice, First Nations disputes around the development of the oil and gas industry in Canada... There have never been so many social mobilizations and protests about our social relationship with nature and its protection. The aim of the article is to understand the difficult passage from intention to action: no one today can stand against nature. How then to understand the inability to link principles and actions and the low performativity of discourses in favor of the environment? The article shows the permanence of the "ecological modernization" framework and its (in)capacity to frame, at a normative and cognitive level, environmental risks agenda in balance with economic and social development; citizen participation face to formal institutional negotiations and the social construction of environmental injustice against poorly shared political decisions. The overall contribution of the article is to provide a reading of current criticisms and mobilizations which obviously inform us about a global crisis of "governmentality" of environmental decisions. </div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".