Neurometabolic predictors of mental effort in the frontal cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivation drives individuals to overcome costs to achieve desired outcomes, such as rewards or avoidance of punishment, with significant variability across individuals. The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dmPFC/dACC) and anterior insula are key brain regions implicated in effort-based decision-making. Here, we utilized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) at 7 Tesla on 69 healthy participants in these brain regions to uncover the neurometabolic factors that influence these differences. We designed and applied an effort-based decision-making task requiring mental and physical effort to probe motivated behavior, complemented by computational modeling to extract key behavioral parameters. Gradient boosting machine learning was applied to explore the predictive role of specific metabolites in motivated behavior. Our results reveal that a model established on dmPFC/dACC metabolites explains decisions to exert high mental effort and sensitivity to mental effort. In particular, glutamate, aspartate, and lactate in dmPFC/dACC, three metabolites linked through the tricarboxylic acid cycle and glycolysis, were identified as key discriminative metabolites in the dmPFC/dACC, predictive of mental effort choices, underpinning energy supply and cognitive processes. Anterior insula metabolites did not significantly relate to effort-related decisions. Notably, glutamine and lactate levels between the periphery (plasma) and the dmPFC/dACC were correlated, suggesting a metabolic link between peripheral and central biomarkers of effort. Our findings provide novel insights into the neurometabolic underpinnings of motivated behavior and propose novel biomarkers for mental effort-based decision-making. Importantly, our study highlights the relevance of multivariable approaches in elucidating complex cognitive functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".