MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414589609 · doi:10.1080/21501203.2025.2561612

Research advances and public health strategies in China on WHO priority fungal pathogens

2025· review· en· W4414589609 on OpenAlex
Yue Wang, Li Han, Jie Gong, Liu Liu, Beibei Miao, Jianping Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMycology&#58 An International Journal on Fungal Biology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPublic healthGlobal healthWeb of scienceStrategic planningIntervention (counseling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fungal pathogens pose significant and increasing threats to public health. Each year, over a billion people are infected by fungal pathogens, directly contributing to millions of deaths. To overcome the challenge of fungal threat, in 2022, World Health Organization (WHO) issued a Fungal Priority Pathogens List (FPPL) aimed at strengthening international response, promoting research, and enhancing policy intervention development. Over the past four decades, China has made tremendous progress in advancing our knowledge of fungal infections. Here, we review research trends and recent progress in China on fungal pathogens on the WHO FPPL, with an emphasis on four critical pathogens: Cryptococcus neoformans, Candidozyma auris, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Candida albicans since 2022. In addition, we describe national policies and strategic measures aimed at large-scale prevention and control of fungal infections. Our bibliometric analyses of articles published by Chinese researchers from 1983 to 2024 in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC, English-language) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, Chinese-language) revealed increasing number of peer-reviewed publications on human fungal pathogens in both databases up to 2008 when the number in the CKNI database dropped and remained relatively flat since while that in the WOSCC database continued to increase, reflecting the strategic emphasis by Chinese institutions and funding agencies on achieving greater international visibility, academic impact, and integration within the global scientific community. In both databases, the four critical priority pathogens accounted for > 45% of the studies and the progresses made by Chinese researchers since 2022 on them are described here. A shared challenge for treating all fungal infections is the emergence and spread of antifungal resistance. We highlight antifungal resistance, tolerance, and persistence, and describe recent developments in antifungal drug pipelines, including those in China. Beyond scientific breakthroughs, China has been making coordinated prevention efforts and robust policy measures. However, significant challenges remain in understanding pathogen population dynamics and host-pathogen interactions; in developing and deploying rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective diagnosis; in designing geographic region-specific and personalized prevention and treatments; and in alleviating the growing burden of antifungal resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it