MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414591095 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.105833

Body weight optimization of broiler breeder hens. 2. Reproductive performance

2025· article· en· W4414591095 on OpenAlexafffund
Thiago L. Noetzold, R.P. Kwakkel, B.I. Fancher, Marcelo Francisco da Silva, Alan Thomson, M.J. Zuidhof

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Hatching Egg ProducersUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Agriculture and ForestryCanadian Poultry Research Council
KeywordsGompertz functionBody weightWeight gainBreeder (animal)Factorial experimentBroilerAnalysis of varianceGrowth rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of shifted gain from the pubertal to prepubertal phase (early growth; EG ) and timing of maximum pubertal growth (inflection point of a second growth phase; I2 ) on BW, feed efficiency, carcass composition, and reproductive performance of broiler breeder hens. Target BW trajectories were designed by changing coefficients of a 3-phase Gompertz model fit to the recommended Ross 308 BW target, B W = ∑ i = 1 i = 3 g i e x p ( − exp ( − b i ( t − I i ) ) ) . In each phase i , biologically relevant coefficients describe the amount of BW gain ( g i ), the rate of growth ( b i ), and the inflection point ( I i ), which is the age (wk) when the growth for that phase is at its peak. The study had a 6 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments, with six I2 levels ( I from phase 2) and two EG levels. The I2 coefficients were 15, 17, 19, 21 (standard), 22, and 23. The EG treatments were: EG0, where g 1 and g 2 coefficients estimated from the standard breeder recommended BW were unchanged; and EG20, where 20% of the gain ( g 2 ) in phase 2 (pubertal phase) was shifted to phase 1 ( g 1 ; prepubertal phase). Two-hundred-eighty-eight Ross 308 pullets were randomly assigned to the twelve BW growth trajectories and fed using a precision feeding system from 0 to 60 wk of age. Weekly BW was analyzed using three-way ANOVA (EG, I2, and age as fixed sources of variation). Analysis of covariance was conducted on the remaining dependent variables with EG as fixed effect, I2 as a continuous fixed effect, and age as continuous effect. The observed BW followed the BW target trajectories for most of the experiment duration. Dorsal feather score decreased by 0.11/wk of earlier I2. Egg production, egg weight, and egg mass increased by 0.83%, 0.09 g, and 0.54 g/d for every week of earlier I2, respectively. Total eggs produced and estimated chick number per hen increased by 3.6 eggs and 4.4 chicks for every week of earlier I2, respectively. In conclusion, advancing BW gain around the pubertal phase of growth in modern broiler breeders increased egg and chick production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207