Sensory evaluation and proximate composition of the mangrove Stone Crab (Myomenippe hardwickii) (Gray, 1831) claw meat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crab claw meat is a popular seafood delicacy valued for its rich nutritional content and appealing sensory qualities. The mangrove Stone Crab (Myomenippe hardwickii) claw meat was compared to four other commercially available fresh crab claw meats (Portunus pelagicus, P. sanguinolentus, Scylla tranquebarica and Charybdis natator) in terms of proximate composition and sensory evaluation. In terms of proximate composition M. hardwickii claw meat was found to comprise 79.1% moisture, 1.98% ash, 22.03% protein and 2.1% lipid; these values were not significantly different from values obtained from the crab claw meat of the other crab species used in this study. For sensory evaluation, it was found that M. hardwickii claw meat compared favourably to other crab claw meats with high scores in terms of texture, taste, scent and overall acceptance. The findings suggest that M. hardwickii claw meat is nutritionally comparable and sensory appealing, making it a viable seafood alternative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".