MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414596502 · doi:10.1002/bit.70073

Intrinsically Fluorescent Nano‐Scaled Peptide Aggregates Upon Arginine to Citrulline Swap

2025· article· en· W4414596502 on OpenAlexafffund
Nauman Nazeer, Anupama Ghimire, Jan K. Rainey, William D. Lubell, Brian D. Wagner, Marya Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPeptideFluorescenceGuanidineSupramolecular chemistryStackingHydrogen bondSide chainResidue (chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The supramolecular assembly of short peptides into ordered structures offers promise for developing bio-nanomaterials with diverse applications in drug delivery, electronics, and optical engineering. Intrinsic fluorescence of polypeptide aggregates is typically associated with delocalization of electron densities in dense hydrogen bonding networks, dipolar coupling of aromatic amino acid residues, and possibly by the 'cluster-derived luminescence' associated with supramolecular structures. In a handful of examples, self-assembly of short peptides has provided ordered intrinsically fluorescent nanostructures. In this study, replacement of a single arginine residue with citrulline in a macrocyclic peptide has led to intrinsic fluorescence. The parent arginine-containing peptide macrocycle was previously shown to adopt a β-sheet conformation that aggregated into nonfluorescent spherical particles. The change from the electrostatic positive charge of the guanidine side chain to a hydrogen bonding neutral urea caused the β-sheet peptide to aggregate into larger-sized intrinsically fluorescent rods by a phenomenon that is ascribed to electron delocalization through π-π stacking interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topicSupramolecular Self-Assembly in MaterialsFrench-language works237,207