MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414597492 · doi:10.1007/s10586-025-05629-x

Time-and-Traffic-aware collaborative task offloading with service caching-replacement in cloud-assisted mobile edge computing

2025· article· en· W4414597492 on OpenAlexaff
Gurpreet Singh Chhabra, Satish Kumar Satti, Goluguri N. V. Rajareddy, Abhijeet Mahapatra, G. Lakshmeeswari, Kaushik Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueCluster Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile edge computingScalabilityEdge computingComputation offloadingAdaptabilityCloud computingCloudletService (business)Knapsack problemReinforcement learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The rapid growth of Internet of Things (IoT) applications has increased the demand for ultra-low-latency and energy-efficient computing. While Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) addresses these demands by shifting computation from the centralized cloud to edge servers, its limited resources pose a major challenge. In particular, making optimal decisions for service caching and task offloading under dynamic network conditions and energy constraints remains a critical issue. Efficient caching is essential for latency-sensitive IoT tasks, yet only a subset of services can be stored at MEC-enabled base stations (BSs) due to storage limitations. This paper proposes a Cloud-assisted MEC framework that jointly optimizes service caching, service replacement, and task offloading to enhance long-term system performance. A two-phase solution is developed: first, an Irregular Cellular Learning Automata (ICLA)-based algorithm classifies traffic patterns and timescales, and a Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning (DDRL) algorithm performs adaptive, decentralized task offloading. To address caching constraints, a dynamic 0–1 knapsack approach selects services based on popularity, while a Q-learning-based policy handles service replacement. Simulation results validate the framework’s effectiveness, showing significant reductions in service latency and energy usage, with improved scalability and adaptability over traditional centralized approaches. The proposed method offers a robust and practical solution for next-generation MEC systems supporting real-time IoT services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCluster ComputingSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207