MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414598344 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2025-0153

Synthesis of a quinoxaline dimer and trimer via Yamamoto coupling

2025· article· en· W4414598344 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Zachary W. Schroeder, Emily K Small, Steven M. Maley, Kenneth E. Maly

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Biological Evaluation
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilfrid Laurier UniversityCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Research Foundation
KeywordsTrimerQuinoxalineDimerMesophaseLuminescenceExcited stateCharacterization (materials science)Derivative (finance)Spectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quinoxalines are an important class of compounds that can exhibit properties such as luminescence and liquid crystal phases. The corresponding quinoxaline dimers and their cyclotrimers, in contrast, have received little attention. We report the synthesis and characterization of a novel tetrakis(dialkoxyphenyl)biquinoxaline derivative (1) and the corresponding novel hexakis(dialkoxyphenyl)-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazatrinaphthylene (2) using the nickel-mediated Yamamoto coupling as a key step. The resulting compounds show solvent-dependent emission spectra in solution, suggesting a donor–acceptor architecture with charge separation in the excited state. Preliminary mesophase characterization reveals that both compounds also exhibit columnar mesophases, as shown by polarized optical microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry, and form glasses upon cooling to room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Biological EvaluationFrench-language works237,207