La scène de la prière de Jésus-Christ à Gethsémani dans les <i>Passions</i> d’Eustache Mercadé et d’Arnoul Gréban
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la scène de la prière de Jésus à Gethsémani dans le Mystère de la Passion d’Arnoul Gréban, en la comparant à celle d’Eustache Mercadé (Passion d’Arras) d’un point de vue narratif et rhétorique. Tout en suivant le modèle établi par Mercadé, Gréban complexifie la trame narrative et représente Dieu le Père et Jésus comme étant capables de susciter l’empathie. Tandis que Mercadé recourt aux onzains pour mettre en relief les prières de Jésus et les réponses de saint Michel, Gréban privilégie les octosyllabes à rimes plates afin de mieux transmettre l’enjeu théologique de son oeuvre, et d’accentuer l’interaction fluide entre l’humain et le divin. Il soigne aussi davantage les rimes, cherchant à peindre Dieu le Père comme une figure à la fois miséricordieuse et glorieuse. Ainsi, l’analyse de cette scène témoigne du sens de la convenance chez Gréban qui s’inscrit, tout comme son prédécesseur, dans la tradition du decorum horatien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".