Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse aux premiers poèmes abécédaires en français composés aux xiiie et xive siècles. Ces sept textes, la plupart sous la forme de prières à Marie en rimes équivoquées, cumulent les contraintes sémantiques et formelles : il s’agit de débuter chaque strophe par une lettre selon l’ordre de l’alphabet et de trouver pour elle un énoncé signifiant dans le cadre de la louange. La prière se déroule ainsi horizontalement au fil des vers, tandis que, verticalement, l’ABC se déploie en acrostiche. Ce corpus, héritier de la production lettriste médiolatine et précurseur de la Seconde Rhétorique, oscille entre la perpétuation de la tradition et l’innovation mue par les ressources inédites de la langue d’oïl. À ce titre, et c’est l’hypothèse de l’article, il forme l’un des creusets dans lesquels s’élabore la poésie en français. Son instabilité foncière, rendue sensible par le style poétique, notamment par la virtuosité des équivoques, exprime la quête par laquelle le langage, humain et faillible, s’élève vers le ciel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".