MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414609734 · doi:10.22374/cjmrp.v23i1.19

How the Last Province/Territory in Canada to Launch Midwifery Services used the ICM Midwifery Services Framework as a Guide

2024· article· fr· W4414609734 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cora Cole

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsHealth PEI
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)PopulationPublic policyHealth servicesGoods and services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With a resurging demand for midwifery services by the public and community organizations, the government of PEI responded with a commitment in 2019 to introduce regulated midwifery services. This paper compares the process used in Canada’s smallest province, Prince Edward Island, to launch midwifery services using the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) Midwifery Services Framework (MSF). RÉSUMÉÉtant donné la demande croissante de services sage-femme par la population et les organismes communautaires, le gouvernement de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard a répondu en 2019 en s’engageant à instaurer de telles prestations réglementées. Le présent article vise à comparer le processus adopté pour le lancement des services sage-femme par la plus petite province canadienne, l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard, qui s’est servie du cadre élaboré par la Confédération internationale des sages-femmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Midwifery Research and PracticeSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207