Observing biological spatio-angular structures and dynamics with statistical image reconstruction and polarized fluorescence microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding molecular orientation and density distributions is essential for exploring biological structure and function. Polarized fluorescence microscopy (PFM) provides insights into molecular architecture but struggles to resolve three-dimensional (3D) molecular orientation distributions, particularly in densely labeled or structurally complex specimens. To address this, we introduce the efficient generalized Richardson-Lucy (eGRL) algorithm, a robust framework for reconstructing 3D molecular density and orientation (spatio-angular) distributions from PFM data. By modeling the imaging process in spatio-angular hyperspace, we propose a maximum-likelihood solution enhanced by dimensionality reduction and angular domain transformation to overcome computational challenges. eGRL improves accuracy and efficiency across different PFM implementations, enabling use on standard platforms. We utilize our methods to resolve biological spatio-angular structures and dynamics otherwise impossible to resolve, including the tangential alignment of actin filaments in U2OS cells, nanowire-guided cytoskeletal organization in NIH3T3 cells, rotational actin patterns in live HeLa protrusions, and membrane tension-induced anisotropy in live macrophages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".