MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome as a potential contributor to pediatric-onset psychosis: a case-based hypothesis

2025· article· en· W4414619662 on OpenAlexaff
Parinda Parikh, Ananya Reddy Dadem, Dilnuer Wubuli, Isa Gultekin, Rithika Narravula, Arushi Chandra-Kaushik, Avish Chandra, Ishant Buddhavarapu, Mina Oza

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research in Medical Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological Complications and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationPsychosisEtiologyNephrotic syndromePathophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is a type of primary glomerulopathy that results in multiple complications, including edema and hyperlipidemia. Most existing studies indirectly attribute psychiatric manifestations in SSNS to corticosteroid therapy, while its etiological role in neuroinflammation remains rarely discussed. This article aims to explore this association through a unique case report. An investigation of available English-language literature providing insight into pathophysiology of SSNS, neuroinflammation, and psychosis was done. Information collected was reviewed and analysed for quality and relevance. We present a rare case of a 13-year-old male with SSNS, who exhibited escalating oppositional behavior, emotional dysregulation, and aggression, resulting in a parental request for discontinuation of steroids and immunosuppressants. Despite cessation of medication, symptoms progressed to worsening of psychosis with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations, raising concerns for a potential link between SSNS and neuropsychiatric origin. Collateral history revealed discontinuation of immunosuppressant therapy in early childhood, indicating its limited significance in the current presentation. This case elucidates the potential correlation between SSNS and psychosis in pediatric patients from a pathophysiological and neuropsychiatric point of view, necessitating further investigations into its underlying mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research in Medical SciencesSame topicNeurological Complications and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207