MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414622998 · doi:10.7302/27250

Tempting the Nation: Imperial Belonging and the Politics of Venereal Disease in Canada?s Great War, 1914-1920

2025· dissertation· en· W4414622998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cheyenne Pettit

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsSyphilisBritish EmpireGeopoliticsDiplomacyHegemonyForegroundingPolitical history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Tempting the Nation: Imperial Belonging and the Politics of Venereal Disease in Canada’s Great War, 1914-1920,” examines the moral and medical conflicts over the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in the United Kingdom to tell a new political history of the British Empire in the First World War. Examining conflicts between Canadian, dominion, and British authorities over the effects of venereal infections in the UK on military preparedness reveals the interpenetration of medical, military, and political history at a key moment in global history where eugenic thought directly influenced decision-making processes. Drawing from archives in Canada and the United Kingdom, the project uses military and medical correspondence, court documents, the minutes of the Royal Commissions on Venereal Disease (1913-16 and 1918), and women’s’ newspapers from across the political spectrum to reveal how wartime pressures turned the treatment of medical issues into matters of grave geopolitical importance. “Tempting the Nation” emphasizes how wartime circumstances of geographical proximity and necessary, if temporary, co-governance exacerbated tensions between British and Canadian authorities over venereal disease rates in the metropole. It argues that these had long term effects for both Canadians and British people, including during the period of demobilization and the writing of peace treaties, with implications for postwar developments in the Dominions and the development of the Commonwealth. Foregrounding local interactions makes clear the ways that larger questions of national and imperial identity were at stake in efforts to control sexually transmitted disease. Disagreements between British and Canadian authorities in the UK over the eruption of syphilis within Canadian troops stationed in the United Kingdom and local women’s roles in venereal disease transmission led to intra-imperial conflicts with local, regional, and transatlantic stakes. Particular moments, like the imposition of Defense of the Realm Act regulation 40D, show how the longer histories of sexual regulation and the legacies of the Contagious Diseases Acts shaped the wartime experience of public health in the United Kingdom. Thus, this dissertation demonstrates that the global history of sexual regulation and the regulation of women’s bodies in the name of public health are integral to understanding the longer history of imperial and Dominion political relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeep Blue (University of Michigan)Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207