MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414629349 · doi:10.1186/s13256-025-05540-4

Full-thickness tracheal laceration managed conservatively: a case report

2025· article· en· W4414629349 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nikita Arora, Maude Rancourt, Mahesh Nagappa, Mehdi Qiabi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurgical oncologyMEDLINESurgical proceduresConservative treatmentConservative management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial injuries, which are rare complications of intubation, can be overlooked without a high degree of clinical suspicion. While traditionally managed surgically, recent literature proposes nonoperative management for low-risk injuries. CASE PRESENTATION: This case illustrates a 56-year old Caucasian Canadian female with a grade IIIA injury successfully treated conservatively using an endotracheal tube and medical therapy. Consequently, it suggests that nonoperative management may be suitable for patients meeting specific criteria indicative of clinical stability. CONCLUSION: These insights challenge the conventional surgical approach and emphasize the potential efficacy of conservative measures in selected cases of tracheobronchial injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Case ReportsSame topicTrauma Management and DiagnosisFrench-language works237,207