MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414629946 · doi:10.1177/14748851251380542

The retrieval of liberal socialism

2025· article· en· W4414629946 on OpenAlex
Christine Sypnowich

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Political Theory · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalismCreedNormativeSocialismClassical liberalismPoliticsPolitical philosophyTheme (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liberalism has long been seen as at odds with socialism, the former deeming the latter to be a creed inherently hostile to freedom. This view is the target of Matthew McManus's stimulating and timely new book, The Political Theory of Liberal Socialism . The book's central, compelling claim is that liberal principles can only be fully realised in a society with the high degree of material and social equality offered by socialism. McManus explores this theme with a critical genealogy of ‘liberal socialists’, from Mary Wollstonecraft to John Rawls to Charles Mills, drawing inspiration from the critic of ‘possessive individualism’, C.B. Macpherson. The result is an illuminating study, notwithstanding some methodological and normative limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it