MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414644113 · doi:10.32481/djph.2025.09.04

A Look at Substance Use Diversion Programs in the Delaware Criminal Justice System Using the Sequential Intercept Model

2025· article· en· W4414644113 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen A. Donnelly, Joanna Champney, Michael Records

Bibliographic record

VenueDelaware Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime Patterns and Interventions
Canadian institutionsBC Mental Health & Substance Use Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminal justiceIntervention (counseling)Economic JusticeMental healthSubstance abuseSubstance useAdministration (probate law)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This commentary describes approaches by Delaware health and justice practitioners that divert justice-involved individuals presenting with substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms out of the criminal justice system and enhance connections to treatment and supportive services. It applies the Sequential Intercept Model (SIM) used by the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to discern opportunities for intervention at various stages of criminal processing. Examples of deflection/diversion programs at six of the SIM points are presented. Such cross-system collaborations are helping to redefine criminal justice reform and pathways of care after contact with the criminal justice system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.387
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.050 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDelaware Journal of Public HealthSame topicCrime Patterns and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207