MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414646434 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98724-3_11

The Far-Right Involvement in the Russia-Ukraine War

2025· book-chapter· en· W4414646434 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Katchanovski

Bibliographic record

VenueRethinking political violence · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)NazismPower (physics)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Russia justified its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 by “denazification” of Ukraine. However, this chapter shows that the Russian government misrepresented and inflated the role of the neo-Nazis in Ukraine in order to justify the Russian invasion. Contrary to the Russian government and media claims, the Ukrainian state and the military are not Nazi or neo-Nazi. The evidence shows that the power of the far right, in particular, neo-Nazi Azov movement, significantly increased in Ukraine during the Russia-Ukraine war. They significantly expanded the number, size, and influence of armed formations under their de facto control. Contrary to the narratives propagated by the Western and Ukrainian governments and the media, the far-right armed formations did not deradicalize and depoliticize and were not marginal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRethinking political violenceSame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207