MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414647190 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2025.3616148

Reconfigurable Battery Control With State-of-Health Awareness for Service-Life Extension in DC Fast-Charge Stations

2025· article· en· W4414647190 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyed Amir Assadi, Daniela Galatro, Davis Ngresi, Seif Sarofim, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Battery (electricity)Reliability (semiconductor)ArchitecturePower (physics)Control (management)MicrogridEfficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Battery-Assisted DC Fast Charger (BA-DCFC) stations use stationary Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) to reduce grid-demand fees and reduce the costs associated with the operation and installation of Electric Vehicle (EV) fast charging stations. The service-life and reliability of a BA-DCFC station are significantly influenced by the longevity of the BESS, which is degraded by variations in cell capacity and impedance. BA-DCFC architectures with a reconfigurable BESS (rBESS) can enhance station efficiency and power density, compared to architectures with a fixed-configuration BESS (fBESS). Despite these advantages, the rBESS architecture inherently results in non-uniform cell utilization and aging. To mitigate these challenges, this paper proposes a control algorithm for the rBESS that actively reduces non-uniform aging while achieving higher efficiency than a benchmark fBESS design. A custom hardware-in-the-loop implementation of the rBESS BA-DCFC architecture is used to experimentally demonstrate the inherent non-uniform utilization of the rBESS despite high system-level efficiency during a 37-kW EV charging test. Long-term simulations, incorporating experimental data and aging models are used to compare the proposed control algorithm in the rBESS architecture against the fBESS architecture across various BESS capacities in terms of service-life and reliability. The proposed algorithm improves station service-life by 6.9–7.7% and increases EV charging capacity by up to 15.2%, compared to fBESS systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207