MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414648641 · doi:10.33920/med-08-2509-04

Effects of outdoor air pollution on vitamin D status and public health

2025· article· en· W4414648641 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. В. Кривошеев, I. V. Kozlovsky, L. Yu. Nikitina, А. В. Федоров

Bibliographic record

VenueSanitarnyj vrač (Sanitary Doctor) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiencyVitaminAir pollutionPublic healthPollutantPollution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air pollution has a direct impact on public health and is also accompanied by a decrease in serum vitamin D levels because airborne aerosols absorb and scatter UVB ultraviolet radiation, which is necessary for the production of vitamin D3. Due to the fact that most of the published literature sources reflect a qualitative picture of the processes, there was a need (goal) to quantify the impact of outdoor air pollution on the status of vitamin D and the state of health of the population. We carried out a correlation analysis of the dependence of the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency on the average annual concentration of pollutants (PM2.5, PM10 and NO2), as well as the dependencies of the DALY indicator and mortality associated with the environment on the prevalence of deficiency vitamin D in Europe, the USA and Canada. The main characteristics of the studied population (n=4,369,222), which included healthy, non-pregnant representatives of the Caucasian race (mean value ± standard deviation): age 43.4±26.4 years; serum 25 (OH) D concentration 25.5 ± 9.0 ng / mL; prevalence: vitamin D deficiency (25 (OH) D <20 ng / mL) 55.5 ± 11.7 %; insufficient vitamin D levels (25 (OH) D = 20‑29 ng / ml) 21.8 ± 1.6 %; sufficient vitamin D levels (25 (OH) D ≥30 ng / ml) 22.7 ± 11.2 %; body mass index 26.2 ± 4.6 kg / m2. Statistical studies suggest that air pollution in the range of real concentrations significantly increases the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Europe, the United States and Canada. With an increase in PM2.5 concentration by 10 μg / m3, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency increases by 14.2 %, with an increase in PM10 concentration by 10 μg / m3, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency increases by 11.2 %, with an increase in NO2 concentration by 10 μg / m3 the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency increases by 10.98 %. In turn, the increasing prevalence of vitamin D deficiency leads to an increase in the burden of DALY morbidity and environment-related mor tality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanitarnyj vrač (Sanitary Doctor)Same topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207