MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414651921 · doi:10.1007/s40744-025-00793-3

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 196-Week Results from the KEEPsAKE 1 and KEEPsAKE 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

2025· article· en· W4414651921 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J.K. Östör, Filip Van den Bosch, Kim Papp, Mauro Waldemar Keiserman, Ricardo Blanco, A Crowley, Douglas White, Ana Biljan, Tshepiso Madihlaba, Kyle Carter, Fang Liu, Ahmed M. Soliman, Doug Ashley, Michael M. Chen, Lila Glotfelty, Alan Kivitz

Bibliographic record

VenueRheumatology and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialClinical trialPsoriasisAdverse effectMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ongoing KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 (KS1; KS2) trials evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had an inadequate response to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s) (csDMARD-IR, KS1&2) and/or 1–2 biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR, KS2). Herein, we present week 196 efficacy and safety findings from KS1 and KS2. Patients were randomized 1:1 in a double-blind fashion to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo (weeks 0, 4, 16, and 24). All patients received open-label risankizumab at week 28 and every 12 weeks thereafter (i.e., continuous risankizumab, placebo/risankizumab). Assessments included ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in PsA symptoms using American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20/50/70) and achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA). At week 196, 749 patients remained in KS1 and 289 in KS2. In KS1, 57.1% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 56.5% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved ACR20, while 54.5% receiving continuous risankizumab and 50.2% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved ACR20 in KS2 at week 196. Maintenance of ACR20 achievement in KS1 from week 52 to week 196 was observed for 71.0% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 72.7% receiving placebo/risankizumab. The same was observed in KS2 for 68.7% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 73.0% receiving placebo/risankizumab. The proportion of patients achieving MDA was 39.6% receiving continuous risankizumab and 35.2% receiving placebo/risankizumab in KS1, while 35.3% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 37.4% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved MDA in KS2 at week 196. In KS1, maintenance of MDA at week 196 from week 52 was achieved by 72.8% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 72.2% receiving placebo/risankizumab. In KS2, 77.0% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 70.3% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved the same. No new safety signals were reported. Risankizumab demonstrated durable efficacy and safety at week 196 in KS1 and KS2. KS1: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03675308; KS2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03671148. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that commonly occurs in the presence of psoriasis. Due to PsA’s chronicity, durable treatments are necessary to help patients with PsA attain minimal disease activity (MDA). The ongoing KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 (KS1; KS2) trials are evaluating the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with PsA who were unsuccessfully treated with one or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s) (csDMARD; KS1&2) and/or one or two biologic DMARDs (bDMARD; KS2). Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or a placebo for 24 weeks. At week 28, all patients received risankizumab 150 mg for the remainder of the trials. In both trials, most patients who achieved ≥ 20% reduction in American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20) and MDA (meeting ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity) at week 52 maintained their response at week 196. At week 196, 57.1% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 56.5% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved ACR20 in KS1. In KS2, 54.5% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 50.2% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved ACR20 at week 196. The proportion of patients achieving MDA was 39.6% receiving continuous risankizumab, and 35.2% receiving placebo/risankizumab in KS1, while 35.3% of patients receiving continuous risankizumab and 37.4% receiving placebo/risankizumab achieved MDA in KS2 at week 196. Improvements were seen in several other measures in both trials and no new safety signals were reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRheumatology and TherapySame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207