Joint Scheduling and Placement for Vehicular Intelligent Applications Under QoS Constraints: A PPO-Based Precedence-Preserving Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing demand for low-latency, computationally intensive vehicular applications, such as autonomous navigation and real-time perception, has led to the adoption of cloud–edge–vehicle infrastructures. These applications are often modeled as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) with interdependent subtasks, where precedence constraints enforce causal ordering while allowing concurrency. We propose a task offloading framework that decomposes applications into precedence-constrained subtasks and formulates the joint scheduling and offloading problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) to capture the latency–energy trade-off. The system state incorporates vehicle positions, wireless link quality, server load, and task-buffer status. To address the high dimensionality and sequential nature of scheduling, we introduce DepSchedPPO, a dependency-aware sequence-to-sequence policy that processes subtasks in topological order and generates placement decisions using action masking to ensure partial-order feasibility. This policy is trained using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) with clipped surrogates, ensuring stable and sample-efficient learning under dynamic task dependencies. Extensive simulations show that our approach consistently reduces task latency, energy consumption and QOS compared to conventional heuristic and DRL-based methods. The proposed solution demonstrates strong applicability to real-time vehicular scenarios such as autonomous navigation, cooperative sensing, and edge-based perception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".