Molecular Diagnostics and Personalized Therapeutics in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Clinically Oriented Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy and typically has a favorable prognosis. However, a subset of patients experience aggressive disease, recurrence, or treatment resistance, underscoring the need for more precise diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Advances in molecular profiling have improved the management of thyroid cancer by enabling risk-adapted treatment and targeted interventions. This narrative review offers a clinically focused synthesis of the current role of molecular diagnostics and personalized therapeutics in DTC. We examine key genetic alterations and their diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications, and discuss how molecular markers enhance traditional risk stratification systems, informing surgical decisions, radioactive iodine (RAI) use, and surveillance. The growing role of targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and agents against specific oncogenic drivers, is reviewed, particularly for RAI-refractory DTC. We also address real-world challenges in implementing precision medicine, including access, cost, and standardization. Future directions, such as liquid biopsy, artificial intelligence, and multi-omic integration, are explored as tools to achieve fully personalized care. This review aims to bridge the gap between molecular discovery and clinical application, offering practical insights for endocrinologists, surgeons, oncologists, and multidisciplinary teams managing DTC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".