PARKA AI: A Sensor-Integrated Mobile Application for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring and Self-Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting over 10 million people worldwide, necessitates continuous symptom monitoring to optimize treatment and enhance quality of life. Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) is vital but often hindered by fragmented data and cognitive impairments. PARKA AI, a novel iOS application, leverages Apple Watch HealthKit data (e.g., tremor detection, mobility metrics, heart rate, and sleep patterns) and integrates it with self-reported logs (e.g., mood, medication adherence) to empower PD self-management and improve patient-HCP interactions. Employing a human-centered design approach, we developed a high-fidelity prototype using a large language model (LLM)- Google Gemini 1.5 Flash-to process and analyze self-reports and objective sensor-derived data from Apple Healthkit to generate patient-friendly summaries and concise HCP reports. PARKA AI provides accessible data visualizations, personalized self-management tools, and streamlined HCP reports to foster engagement and communication. This paper outlines the derived design requirements, prototype features, and illustrative use cases to show how LLMs can be used in digital health tools. Future work will focus on real-world usability testing to validate the application's efficacy and accessibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".