PARKA AI: A Sensor-Integrated Mobile Application for Parkinson’s Disease Monitoring and Self-Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting over 10 million people worldwide, necessitates continuous symptom monitoring to optimize treatment and enhance quality of life. Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) is vital but often hindered by fragmented data and cognitive impairments. PARKA AI, a novel iOS application, leverages Apple Watch HealthKit data (e.g., tremor detection, mobility metrics, heart rate, and sleep patterns) and integrates it with self-reported logs (e.g., mood, medication adherence) to empower PD self-management and improve patient-HCP interactions. Employing a human-centered design approach, we developed a high-fidelity prototype using a large language model (LLM)- Google Gemini 1.5 Flash-to process and analyze self-reports and objective sensor-derived data from Apple Healthkit to generate patient-friendly summaries and concise HCP reports. PARKA AI provides accessible data visualizations, personalized self-management tools, and streamlined HCP reports to foster engagement and communication. This paper outlines the derived design requirements, prototype features, and illustrative use cases to show how LLMs can be used in digital health tools. Future work will focus on real-world usability testing to validate the application's efficacy and accessibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it