MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414667440 · doi:10.1002/alr.70038

Sinonasal Sarcomas Management: An International Consensus Statement

2025· article· en· W4414667440 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Vinciguerra, F Caspani, Marco Valentini, Anna Maria Camarda, Salvatore Provenzano, Eric W. Wang, Cem Meço, Marco Ferrari, Pavol Šurda, Semi Harrabi, Fernando Augusto Batista Campos, Javier Martín‐Broto, B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Pierina Navarria, Ali Hosni, Nadia Hindi, Antoine Italiano, Daniel M. Trifiletti, Bernd Kasper, Benjamin Vérillaud, Alberto Schreiber, Paolo Castelnuovo, Piero Nicolai, Iacopo Dallan, Matías Chacón, Shirley Y. Su, Juliette Thariat, Claudia Valverde, Matt Lechner, Jean Anderson Eloy, Maria Rosaria Fiore, Mehdi Brahmi, James Palmer, Victor Castro Oliden, Daniela Greto, Iwona Ługowska, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Thibaut Van Zele, Alkis J. Psaltis, Paolo G. Casali, Armelle Dufresne, Claudia Sangalli, Christos Georgalas, Ester Orlandi, Peter‐John Wormald, Philippe Herman, Ricardo Carrau, Lisa Licitra, Mario Turri‐Zanoni, Paolo Battaglia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachStatement (logic)ReferralMEDLINEMultidisciplinary teamSarcoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Sinonasal sarcomas are exceedingly rare entities, constituting less than 7% of head and neck sarcomas. Their complex histology needs specialized treatment, which is often based on multimodal approaches including surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. This manuscript aims to gather expert opinions to establish common management principles for sinonasal sarcomas. METHODS: This international consensus followed a modified Delphi method in seven steps, including statements definition by the core group, expert panel recruitment, and a two-round survey. Sixty-two statements on sinonasal sarcoma management were developed. Experts from multiple continents participated, and results were anonymized and analyzed between March and May 2025. RESULTS: A total of 44 invited experts were recruited, 43.2% otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons, 31.8% medical oncologists, and 25% radiation oncologists. Participants varied in age and experience, representing Europe (70.5%), North America (18.2%), South America (6.8%), and Asia (4.5%). Among all histologies, biphenotypic sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and myofibrosarcoma are principally treated with an upfront surgical management, differently from Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma in which chemotherapy, eventually associated with radiotherapy, is often chosen. In the remaining histologies (angiosarcoma, liposarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor [MPNST], osteosarcoma, and synovial sarcoma), a precise multimodal treatment is less standardized and needs to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: Sinonasal sarcomas require a histology-driven approach to determine upfront treatment, whether surgical, medical, or multimodal. Despite this structured strategy, prognosis remains highly variable across subtypes. Multidisciplinary evaluation and individualized management in referral centers are crucial to address the biological diversity and anatomical complexity of these rare malignancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.099
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.075
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0990.075
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Forum of Allergy & RhinologySame topicHead and Neck Surgical OncologyFrench-language works237,207