MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414670867 · doi:10.3390/math13193121

On Bi-Univalent Function Classes Defined via Gregory Polynomials

2025· article· en· W4414670867 on OpenAlexaff
Ibtisam Aldawish, Mallikarjun G. Shrigan, Sheza M. El-Deeb, H. M. Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAl-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Subordination (linguistics)Function (biology)SubclassUnit diskUnit (ring theory)Difference polynomials

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce and study a new subclass of bi-univalent functions related to Mittag–Leffler functions associated with Gregory polynomials and satisfy certain subordination conditions defined in the open unit disk. We derive coefficient bounds for the Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients |γ2| and |γ3|, and also explore the Fekete–Szegö functional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicAnalytic and geometric function theoryFrench-language works237,207