MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414673812 · doi:10.63332/joph.v5i9.3425

From Bedside to Algorithms: The Emerging Role of Nurses in the AI Era

2025· article· en· W4414673812 on OpenAlexaff
MONA HUSSEIN MOHAMAD AL MALAQ, SAMIRAH TURKEY AHMAD AL-GARNI, MAJED HAIDAR AHMAD ALKATHIRI, FAISAL DHYFALLAH ALMALKI, ASMAHAN MOHAMMED HAYYAN, ZAHRA HASSAN ABDALLAH ALNAZGHAH, ZAINAB HASSAN ALNAZGHAH, AFAF ALI IBRAHIM ALTHAHEB, RABAB ABDULAZIZ ALQUDAIHI, LAILA ABDULAZIZ ALQUDAIHI, DUAA SALMAN ALSANONA, TAHANI ABDULLAH AL HELAIL, NAWAL HASSAN HUSSAIN ALSAGER, Samer Abdulrhman Alfaidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Posthumanism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMEDLINEBiomedical technologyTelemedicineMedical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nursing has always been at the heart of healthcare, rooted in compassion, bedside presence, and hands-on care. Historically, nurses have been the mediators between medical science and human experience, ensuring patients receive not only treatment but also empathy. With the 21st century’s technological revolution, artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to alter this balance. No longer confined to laboratories or high-level diagnostics, AI is entering daily clinical routines, promising to reshape nursing roles. The journey “from bedside to algorithms” blends caregiving with computational intelligence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.024
Scholarly communication0.0100.015
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PosthumanismSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207