MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414678741 · doi:10.3389/ti.2025.15265

Benefit of BK Polyomavirus Screening in the First Year After Lung Transplantation

2025· letter· en· W4414678741 on OpenAlexaffabout
E. Renoult, David Turgeon, Suzon Collette, François Coutlée, Charles Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplant International · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosuppressionTransplantationKidney transplantationBK virusLung transplantationIncidence (geometry)Polyomavirus InfectionsNephropathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editors Other than case reports of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) with end stage kidney disease [1] or BK polyomavirus (BKPyV)-related urothelial carcinoma [2], little is known about the incidence and effects of BKPyV replication in lung transplant recipients (LTR). Most of BKPyV infection data have been obtained from kidney transplant recipients (KTR) [2]. BKPyVAN, a cause of early renal graft failure, is positively correlated with high plasma BKPyV replication [2]. In KTR, early screening for active BKPyV infection together with reduction of immunosuppression have been shown to be effective for preservation of allograft function [2]. However, the effect of BKPyV replication in LTR has been understudied. We performed a prospective analysis to compare the incidence and kinetics of BKPyV replication between LTR and KTR during the first year after transplantation and to evaluate the course of viral load in LTR. Of the 310 adult patients who underwent kidney or lung transplantation in Montreal University hospitals (Canada) between January 2018 and January 2020, 195 KTR and 102 LTR had a functioning graft at least 3 months after transplantation and were used as the study population. BKPyV replication monitoring was performed using BKPyV QNAT analysis of plasma samples, as part of routine clinical care, at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after transplantation. In LTR, detection of BKPyV replication was not followed by a specific therapeutic intervention but a renal biopsy was scheduled in cases of unexplained kidney dysfunction. In KTR, BKPyV infection was managed by tapering off of the immunosuppressive drugs and regular monitoring for BKPyV-DNAaemia [2]. We examined the incidence, timing and kinetics of BKPyV replication in the LTR cohort and compared the results with those of the KTR cohort in the same period. Occurrence of biopsy proven BKPyVAN, acute rejection, and deaths as well as analysis of the estimated glomerular function rates (eGFR) at 12 and 24 months were evaluated in the LTR group (where BKPyV replication was not managed by reduction of immunosuppression). The main characteristics and the outcomes of the patients are detailed in Table 1. The incidences of BKPyV replication during the first year after transplantation in LTR and KTR was 17% and 30.25% respectively. BKPyV replication occurred within the first 3 months after transplantation in 94% of LTR + and 64% of KTR + . The median peak viral load was 422 copies/mL (range 23 to 79683 copies/mL) in LTR with BKPyV replication (LTR +) and 4770 copies/mL (range 26 to 954 000 copies/mL) in KTR with BKPyV replication (KTR +) (p= 0.0258). Viral load reached 10 000 copies/mL or more, in 23 % of LTR+ and 38.9 % of KTR+ during the first 12 months. One year after transplantation, BKPyV-DNAemia persisted in nine of the LTR+ (median 2290 copies/mL, range 23-126 240 copies/mL). No LTR developed unexplained kidney dysfunction. The eGFR did not differ between LTR+ and LTR- (without BKPyV replication) groups at 12 months and 24 months after transplantation. Four deaths occurred, in the LTR - . LTR+ did not differ from LTR-with respect to age, immunosuppression, and cytomegalovirus serostatus. BKPyV replication is an important cause of kidney dysfunction in the first year after kidney transplantation [2]. Studies reporting the results of screening for BKPyV after lung transplantation are rare and often cross sectional [3, 4, 5]. Doucette et al [6] monitored BKPyV replication in urine and plasma samples from 28 LTR at 3, 6 and 9 months post-transplantation and reported no detectable BKPyV-DNAemia in any subject and BKPyV-DNAuria in 17,8% of LTR. In our larger prospective study performed within 102 LTR, at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after transplantation, monitoring demonstrated BKPyV replication in 17%. This value is high, but less that of our kidney transplant group (30. 25%) studied with the same molecular assay, during the same period when LTR and KTR were under tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids. BKPyV replication was detected early after transplantation, in both groups: the first positive case of BKPyV-DNAemia was observed in the first trimester in LTR and in KTR. The rate of replication was lower in LTR than in KTR. While the diagnosis of BKPyV replication was not followed by changes in the immunosuppression regimen in LTR+, the viral load reached more than 10 000 copies/mL, a value that correlates strongly with presumptive BKPyVN in KTR [2]. A kidney biopsy was not systematically performed on LTR + patients. The renal functions of the LTR+ and LTR-patients were not different at 1 or even 2 years after transplantation. Interestingly, one LTR-subject developed renal dysfunction with biopsy-proven BKPyVAN four years after transplantation, The conditions that lead to the development of BKPyVAN from BKPyV replication may differ between KTR and LTR. Some factors are specific to the kidney transplant: the graft (major reservoir of latent BKPyV) may transmit the virus [2]. Acute tubular damage due to early intrarenal immunological and ischemic reperfusion lesions [7], and the placement of ureteral stent during kidney transplant surgery [8] may play a role in the development of BKPyVAN. BKPyV-DNAemia, a surrogate marker of BKPyVAN in kidney transplantation [2] has not be established as such in lung transplantation. Whether there is a lung transplant specific timeline of BKPyVAN remains unclear [9] Recently, Dube et al [1] reported 11 cases of biopsy proven BKPyVAN in LTR presenting with unexplained kidney dysfunction, at a median of 46 months after transplantation. In KTR, before screening protocols were available, most cases of BKPyVAN were diagnosed, in the first year after transplantation, in patients with kidney failure [10]. Based on the results of our prospective, observational study conducted on 102 LTR, routine BKPyV-DNAemia surveillance during the first year after lung transplantation is unlikely to be beneficial as it is in kidney transplantation [2]. To detect BKPyVAN early and preserve renal function, future investigations should focus on the benefit of routine screening (yearly?) after the first year of lung transplantation. Nonetheless BKPyV-DNAemia should be tested upon suspicion of kidney dysfunction (at any time after transplantation) for the diagnosis of BKPyVAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplant InternationalSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207