Corrigendum: Protonation Effects on the Benzoxazine Formation Pathways and Products Distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Francisco W. M. Ribeiro1,2; Isaac Omari;1 J. Scott McIndoe1* Thiago Carita Correra2,* 1Department of Chemistry, University of Victoria, P. O. Box 3065, Victoria, BC V8W 3V6, Canada 2Department of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, Cidade Universitária, Saão Paulo, Saão Paulo 05508-000, Brazil. Figure 3 in the original manuscript (see Figure 1 in this corrigendum) should be replaced by the corrected version shown in Figure 2 below, where the putative reaction mechanism for the formation of IIc is correctly depicted. In “Side Products Observed in the Presence of Acidic Media” section, page 4, the sentence “IIc could react with another formaldehyde molecule generating the intermediate E after dehydration (Figure 3b)” should be corrected to “The neutral form of IIc ([IIc-H]) could react with another protonated formaldehyde molecule generating the intermediate E after dehydration (Figure 3b)”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.107 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".