Democratizing AI in Healthcare with Open Medical Inference (OMI): Protocols, Data Exchange, and AI Integration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is transforming clinical decision-making, patient outcomes, and workflows. AI inference, applying trained models to new data, is central to this evolution, with cloud-based infrastructures enabling scalable AI deployment. The Open Medical Inference (OMI) platform democratizes AI access through open protocols and standardized data formats for seamless, interoperable healthcare data exchange. By integrating standards like FHIR and DICOMweb, OMI ensures interoperability between healthcare institutions and AI services while fostering ethical AI use through a governance framework addressing privacy, transparency, and fairness.OMI's implementation is structured into work packages, each addressing technical and ethical aspects. These include expanding the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Core Dataset for medical imaging, developing infrastructure for AI inference, and creating an open-source DICOMweb adapter for legacy systems. Standardized data formats ensure interoperability, while the AI Governance Framework promotes trust and responsible AI use.The project aims to establish an interoperable AI network across healthcare institutions, connecting existing infrastructures and AI services to enhance clinical outcomes. · OMI develops open protocols and standardized data formats for seamless healthcare data exchange.. · Integration with FHIR and DICOMweb ensures interoperability between healthcare systems and AI services.. · A governance framework addresses privacy, transparency, and fairness in AI usage.. · Work packages focus on expanding datasets, creating infrastructure, and enabling legacy system integration.. · The project aims to create a scalable, secure, and interoperable AI network in healthcare.. · Pelka O, Sigle S, Werner P et al. Democratizing AI in Healthcare with Open Medical Inference (OMI): Protocols, Data Exchange, and AI Integration. Rofo 2026; 198: 173-184.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.061 | 0.070 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".