MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414688067 · doi:10.1080/14622416.2025.2565992

Genetics and response to treatment with metformin for type 2 diabetes

2025· review· en· W4414688067 on OpenAlexafffund
Laurence Tessier, Sophie St-Amour, Joanie Bouchard, Patrice Perron, Karine Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenomics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMetforminType 2 diabetesPharmacogeneticsInsulin resistanceDiabetes mellitusDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes is a chronic disease that affects approximately 589 million people worldwide. Type 2 diabetes is one of its main forms (~90%) and manifests as hyperglycemia due to the resistance of myocytes and adipocytes to insulin. These are unable to capture and use blood glucose. In the long term, T2D can lead to a reduced production of insulin by beta cells, leading to more complex complications. Metformin is the first-line treatment for this condition. However, it may not always be effective for regulating blood glucose levels. Some factors, such as genetics, may influence the drug efficacy for this disease. The aim of this review is to summarize the pharmacogenetic variants associated with response to metformin in T2D treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogenomicsSame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207