MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414688232 · doi:10.7202/1120255ar

Les fondements philosophiques grecs de la sociologie de Michel Freitag

2024· article· fr· W4414688232 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baptiste Rappin

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Société · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHumanities and Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral interestMichel foucaultPractical wisdom

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loin de donner une vue globale de la pensée de Michel Freitag (1935-2009), nous souhaiterions dans cet article nous pencher sur les fondements philosophiques grecs de sa pensée. Nous soutiendrons cette thèse en trois temps : nous établirons tout d’abord que l’anthropologie freitagienne fait très largement écho à celle des philosophes grecs ; nous soulignerons ensuite les traits proprement platoniciens de la sociologie dialectique ; nous montrerons enfin que la pensée de Freitag est structurée, en dernier ressort, selon une métaphysique scalaire provenant d’un profond enracinement du logos dans le cosmos .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers SociétéSame topicHumanities and Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207