MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414688237 · doi:10.7202/1120252ar

<i>A social ecology of capital, </i>de Éric Pineault : Éric Pineault, A Social ecology of capital, Londres et Las Vegas, Pluto Press, 2023, 166 p.

2024· article· fr· W4414688237 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Société · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional resilience and development
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlutoSocial ecologySocial relationshipSocial relationEvolutionary ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A social ecology of capital, de Éric Pineault / Éric Pineault, A Social ecology of capital, Londres et Las Vegas, Pluto Press, 2023, 166 p.. Un article de la revue Cahiers Société (Crise écologique et critique de la société) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers SociétéSame topicRegional resilience and developmentFrench-language works237,207