MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414688290 · doi:10.3138/cjms-2025-0011

Effectiveness of simulation-based transthoracic echocardiography training on Cardiac Sonography Students’ Learning

2025· article· en· W4414688290 on OpenAlex
Babitha Thampinathan, Jacqueline Wheatley, Cameron Redsell-Montgomerie, Laura Thomas, Alisha Krishanthan, Andrea Johnson, Laura Riggs, Adrienn Szabo, Jennifer Kirsty Burton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCanadian journal of medical sonography. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMohawk College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParasternal lineCohortCardiac UltrasoundUltrasoundSession (web analytics)Dreyfus model of skill acquisition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: A primary challenge that cardiac sonography students experience during the echocardiography learning process is correlating the anatomical structures of the heart to transducer-created two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images. Simulation-based training using a manikin may enhance learning, but evidence supporting its effectiveness in Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) education remains limited. This study evaluates the effectiveness of simulation-based versus traditional didactic teaching of cardiac anatomy and corresponding TTE images. Methods: A simulation-based learning lab was introduced in the fall of 2023 within the Cardiac Anatomy TTE course at our institution. Thirty-five first-year cardiac sonography students (with no prior TTE training) completed the traditional didactic course, including pre- and post-course assessments, and participated in a hands-on simulation lab. The session included real-time scanning of a manikin for Parasternal Long Axis, Parasternal Short Axis, Apical 4 Chamber, and Apical 2 Chamber views, alongside an interactive three-dimensional (3D) cardiac anatomy review. The outcomes were compared to a control group (spring 2023 students; n = 42) that completed the didactic course without simulation. Results: Post-course assessment scores were significantly higher in the simulation cohort ( p < 0.0001), with an increase in mean scores from 72.12% (control) to 88.23% (simulation). The knowledge gain was more consistent in the simulation group (SD 3.26%) compared to the control (SD 13.38%). The lowest score in the simulation cohort was 76.47%, compared to 41.18% in the control. Conclusion: Simulation-based teaching significantly enhances knowledge acquisition and retention in cardiac anatomy TTE training of cardiac sonography students. Our findings support integrating structured simulation into echocardiography education to improve the learning process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it