MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414690396 · doi:10.1002/prop.70036

Linear Flux Origins of κ‐Geometry: From Lie Non‐Commutativity to 3‐Lie Nambu Space

2025· article· en· W4414690396 on OpenAlexaff
Mir Faizal, Arshid Shabir

Bibliographic record

VenueFortschritte der Physik · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusCanadian Quantum Research Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsString (physics)HolonomyCharge (physics)Lie algebraDeformation (meteorology)Differential geometrySpace (punctuation)Extension (predicate logic)Central chargeField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Linear background fluxes offer a unified origin for non‐commutative and non‐associative geometries in string and M‐theory. Revisiting the open string with a linearly varying Kalb–Ramond field, we recover kappa‐Minkowski space as a Jordanian deformation of Poincaré symmetry. Lifting the construction to an open M2‐brane in a linear three‐form background yields a kappa‐Nambu triple bracket that realises the three‐Lie algebra of the Bagger–Lambert–Gustavsson model and exposes an underlying quasi‐Hopf two‐algebra. A Bopp‐shift quantisation reveals that isotropic potentials are unaltered at leading order, whereas anisotropic ones receive Planck‐suppressed corrections, and gerbe holonomy discretises the deformation scale. Inspired by the membrane bracket, we build a cubic‐matrix extension of the BFSS model whose higher‐Lie structure supplies the long‐missing five‐brane central charge and reproduces the expected energy scaling of coincident M5‐branes. These results establish linear fluxes as the minimal ingredients that interpolate smoothly from Moyal to Lie and Nambu deformations, providing concrete, anomaly‐free models for non‐associative field theories and five‐brane dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFortschritte der PhysikSame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207