MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414693350 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2025.3616602

A Half-Bridge Single-Stage AC–DC Converter With Single- and Three-Phase Compatibility

2025· article· en· W4414693350 on OpenAlexaff
Ba Phu, Million Gerado Geda, Huu-Phuc Kieu, Sewan Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsRippleCapacitorTotal harmonic distortionDecoupling (probability)VoltageFilter capacitorGalvanic isolationInductorDecoupling capacitorForward converter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a single-stage AC–DC converter based on a dual-active half-bridge topology, supporting both single-phase and three-phase operation. The proposed architecture employs three interleaved totem-pole legs on the AC side and three half-bridge legs with split capacitors on the DC side, reducing the switch count compared to the previous full-bridge approach. The converter achieves full zero-voltage switching (ZVS) for all switches in continuous conduction mode (CCM) and zero-current switching (ZCS) for DC-side switches in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). For single-phase operation, an integrated split-capacitor-type active power decoupling circuit eliminates the second-harmonic ripple in the DC charging current without additional components. To validate the concept, an 11-kW laboratory prototype was developed and tested under both single-phase (220 V<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ac</sub>) and three-phase (380 V<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ac</sub>) inputs, with battery voltages ranging from 400 V<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">dc</sub> to 800 V<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">dc</sub>. Experimental results show peak efficiencies of 96.85%, Experimental results demonstrate a peak efficiency of 96.85%, grid current total harmonic distortion (THD) below 3%, and a power density of 2.7 kW/L.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207