Dynamic Event-Triggered Bipartite Formation for MIMO Multiagent Systems With Quantized Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article deals with fully distributed data-driven bipartite formation control for nonlinear discrete-time multi-input-multi-output multiagent systems (MASs) with unknown dynamics models and quantized information. Initially, a distributed combined measurement error function (DCMEF) is developed for MASs characterized by cooperative and competitive interactions. This function is designed to transform bipartite formation challenges into traditional consensus problems. Subsequently, a distributed compact form dynamic linearization model is established based on the designed DCMEF and input-output data of the MASs, eliminating the need for a strongly connected communication topology. Following this, a logarithmic quantization scheme and a dynamic event-triggered communication mechanism are devised to reduce the communication burden and enhance convergence speed. Finally, a data-driven fully distributed dynamic event-triggered bipartite formation control method is proposed, and its convergence is rigorously proven. Simulation studies and hardware experiments are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it