MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Estimating spatiotemporal variation in mortality improves conservation insights

2025· article· en· W4414695429 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Madeleine G. Lohman, Thomas V. Riecke, James S. Sedinger, Perry J. Williams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHabitatPopulationWildlifeVital ratesVariation (astronomy)WetlandAerial surveyClimate changePopulation growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildlife population dynamics change across time and space, but few studies use formal spatiotemporal statistical models to understand these patterns. The population distribution of mallards (Anas platyrhyncos) in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) has shifted dramatically over the past several decades as agricultural and climate patterns change. We examined spatiotemporal variation in survival, natural mortality, and harvest mortality for mallards in the PPR from 1974–2023 using intrinsic conditional autoregressive models in a Bayesian framework. The results showed substantial variation over time and space for all demographic rates that was related to habitat variables and varied by age and sex classes. Specifically, environmental relationships indicate that habitats with less agricultural activity and more wetlands in breeding grounds may benefit dabbling duck populations but decrease survival via increased natural mortality driven by reproductive risks. We also found a worrying trend: females exhibited declining survival probabilities across the time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→