Les perceptions de la supervision parentale selon les jeunes et leurs parents comme prédicteurs du fonctionnement scolaire à la fin du secondaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine en quoi les perceptions des parents et des adolescent·e·s relatives à la sollicitation et au contrôle parentaux peuvent servir à prédire le rendement et l’engagement scolaires. Des régressions hiérarchiques effectuées sur 133 dyades parent–enfant (66 % filles; âge moyen : 16,88 ans) révèlent que le contrôle perçu par les jeunes est significativement associé à leur engagement et à leur rendement. Quant à la sollicitation perçue, son lien avec l’engagement n’est que marginalement significatif. Les perceptions des parents de leur supervision ne prédisent quant à elles pas le fonctionnement scolaire de l’enfant. Il serait donc important de considérer la perception qu’ont les adolescent·e·s de la supervision parentale lors d’interventions visant à améliorer leur fonctionnement scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".