Chronic inflammatory diseases of the external genitalia in men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article focuses on a very relevant and difficult topic in dermatology – dermatoses localized in the area of the external genitalia in men. This problem accounts for 5 to 15% of all primary visits of men to a urologist or dermatovenerologist. The article provides a detailed description of the features of the skin of the genitals in men, describes the causes and etiological factors leading to the development of chronic inflammatory dermatoses in this area. A review of domestic and foreign literature on dermatological diseases of the external genitalia in men is provided. Balanoposthitis, genital dermatoses of autoimmune genesis are examined in detail, lesions of the external genitalia in chronic inflammatory dermatoses (inverse psoriasis, lichen sclerosus, lichen planus, pemphigus vegetans) are described. For each dermatosis, the article examines in detail the epidemiology, clinical picture with the peculiarity of manifestations in the area of the external genitalia, differential diagnostics, principles of drug therapy. The article is illustrated by the author’s own clinical observations of various dermatoses localized in the ano-genital area in men. And also, the results of successful complex treatment of patients with the use of the topical drug of Russian manufacture Akriderm GK, containing a micronized form of betamethasone dipropionate, gentamicin sulfate and clotrimazole in a number of chronic dermatoses localized in the area of the external genitalia in men are shown. The peculiarity of the clinical picture in the described patients was a bright specific clinic, however, untimely diagnostics and the lack of adequate therapy significantly affected the quality of life of patients. The article may be of interest to dermatovenerologists, urologists, and other specialists dealing with this problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".