MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414704118 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24541-y

Global burden, socioeconomic disparities, and spatiotemporal dynamics of opioid use disorder mortality and disability: a comprehensive analysis from the global burden of disease study 2017-2021

2025· article· en· W4414704118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruoxuan Liu, Xue Wang, L. Zhang, Wei-dong Pei, Junqing Hou, Song Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusBiostatisticsDisease burdenEpidemiologyGeospatial analysisPublic healthYears of potential life lost

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The escalating global burden of opioid use disorder (OUD) necessitates a nuanced understanding of its epidemiological patterns, socioeconomic determinants, and temporal trends. This study quantifies the global, regional, and national burden of OUD-related mortality and disability, evaluates policy correlates, and identifies critical disparities across demographic and socioeconomic strata. METHODS: Using data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017–2021, we analyzed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and their 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) across 204 countries and territories. Joinpoint regression modeled temporal trends, while multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed socioeconomic gradients via the Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Geospatial clustering was evaluated using Moran’s I statistic. Robustness was confirmed through sensitivity analyses, counterfactual modeling, and cross-validation. RESULTS: Globally, OUD mortality increased by 12.4% between 2017 and 2021, with the Americas remaining the epicenter (ASMR: 5.72 per 100,000; +47.3% deaths). Europe demonstrated progress (mortality decline: -1.8%), while Asia and Africa faced rising chronic disability (DALYs: +3.0% and + 10.2%, respectively). National-level extremes ranged from 0.01 per 100,000 in Japan to 7.16 per 100,000 in Canada. A pronounced socioeconomic gradient emerged: high-SDI regions exhibited 17.8-fold higher mortality rates (0.641% vs. 0.036% in low-SDI regions) and 13.9-fold greater DALY rates. Sex disparities persisted (male-to-female mortality ratio: 4.7:1), with males experiencing biphasic trends (+ 3.8% annual percent change [APC] pre-2020, -6.5% post-2020). Geospatial analyses revealed diverging trajectories, including rising mortality in the Americas (+ 4.2% APC) and declines in Africa (-3.1% APC). CONCLUSION: This study highlights stark regional and socioeconomic disparities in the OUD burden, exacerbated by synthetic opioid proliferation in high-income settings and chronic disability in resource-limited regions. Evidence-based harm reduction policies in high-SDI nations mitigated disability, while low-SDI regions faced accelerating crises. Targeted interventions addressing socioeconomic inequities, gender-specific risks, and geospatial vulnerabilities are urgently needed to curb the global opioid epidemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→