MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414704369 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16257-1

High-resolution conditional MR image synthesis through the PACGAN framework

2025· article· en· W4414704369 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matteo Lai, Chiara Marzi, Luca Citi, Stefano Diciotti

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbBioClinicaEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsDiscriminatorOverfittingImage synthesisClassifier (UML)A priori and a posterioriSynthetic dataGenerator (circuit theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning algorithms trained on medical images often encounter limited data availability, leading to overfitting and imbalanced datasets. Synthetic datasets can address these challenges by providing a priori control over dataset size and balance. In this study, we present PACGAN (Progressive Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Network), a proof-of-concept framework that effectively combines Progressive Growing GAN and Auxiliary Classifier GAN (ACGAN) to generate high-quality, class-specific synthetic medical images. PACGAN leverages latent space information to perform conditional synthesis of high-resolution brain magnetic resonance (MR) images, specifically targeting Alzheimer's disease patients and healthy controls. Trained on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, PACGAN demonstrates its ability to generate realistic synthetic images, which are assessed for quality using quantitative metrics. The ability of the generator to perform proper target synthesis of the two classes was also assessed by evaluating the performance of the pre-trained discriminator when classifying real unseen images, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.813, supporting the ability of the model to capture the target characteristics of each class. The pre-trained models of the generator and discriminator, together with the source code, are available in our repository: https://github.com/aiformedresearch/PACGAN .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207