MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414704369 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16257-1

High-resolution conditional MR image synthesis through the PACGAN framework

2025· article· en· W4414704369 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matteo Lai, Chiara Marzi, Luca Citi, Stefano Diciotti

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbBioClinicaEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsDiscriminatorOverfittingImage synthesisClassifier (UML)A priori and a posterioriSynthetic dataGenerator (circuit theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning algorithms trained on medical images often encounter limited data availability, leading to overfitting and imbalanced datasets. Synthetic datasets can address these challenges by providing a priori control over dataset size and balance. In this study, we present PACGAN (Progressive Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Network), a proof-of-concept framework that effectively combines Progressive Growing GAN and Auxiliary Classifier GAN (ACGAN) to generate high-quality, class-specific synthetic medical images. PACGAN leverages latent space information to perform conditional synthesis of high-resolution brain magnetic resonance (MR) images, specifically targeting Alzheimer's disease patients and healthy controls. Trained on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, PACGAN demonstrates its ability to generate realistic synthetic images, which are assessed for quality using quantitative metrics. The ability of the generator to perform proper target synthesis of the two classes was also assessed by evaluating the performance of the pre-trained discriminator when classifying real unseen images, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.813, supporting the ability of the model to capture the target characteristics of each class. The pre-trained models of the generator and discriminator, together with the source code, are available in our repository: https://github.com/aiformedresearch/PACGAN .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207