MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414709188 · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105846

“They ignored our ideas on the sea defence project”: The socio-politics of coastal flood management and climate maladaptation in Keta and Glefe, Ghana

2025· article· en· W4414709188 on OpenAlexaff
Desmond Adjaison, Reforce Okwei, Elmond Bandauko, Hanson Nyantakyi‐Frimpong, Senanu Kwasi Kutor, Godwin Arku

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaWestern University
FundersForestry CommissionWorld Bank GroupExport-Import Bank of the United States
KeywordsFlood mythMaladaptationLivelihoodCoastal managementAdaptation (eye)Coastal floodClimate changeClimate change adaptation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Socio-politics shape coastal flood management in Ghana • Reveals marginalization of local knowledge in adaptation planning • Finds that hard-engineered flood measures disrupt livelihoods in coastal areas. • Propose institutional reforms to transform coastal adaptation planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionSame topicClimate Change, Adaptation, MigrationFrench-language works237,207