MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonlinear decoupling control for highly dynamic fuel cell inlet gas conditioning

2025· article· en· W4414715046 on OpenAlexaff
Dominik Köppel, Joel Mata Edjokola, Merit Bodner, Amir M. Niroumand, Qingxin Zhang, J.L. Lackner, Stefan Jakubek, Christoph Hametner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
FundersTechnische Universität Wien BibliothekÖsterreichische ForschungsförderungsgesellschaftTechnische Universität Wien
KeywordsFeed forwardDecoupling (probability)Test benchControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemTransient (computer programming)Dynamic pressureLinearizationInlet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel cells in transient automotive applications face highly dynamic conditions. Since the inlet gas states are strongly coupled, safe and precise fuel cell operation necessitates advanced gas control. This paper employs the nonlinear control methodology of exact input–output linearization and a parametrized model to decouple cathode inlet pressure and mass flow. The feedforward control obtains the input trajectories for the fuel cell’s peripheral components to guide pressure and mass flow along independent reference paths. The feedforward control is robustly realized in a two-degree-of-freedom architecture on a commercial Greenlight Innovation G60 testbed, allowing for imposing highly dynamic test cycles. It is validated in several experiments on a single cell, underscoring significant improvements in dynamic gas conditioning compared to conventional control approaches. These achieved testing capabilities are particularly valuable for diagnostics, rapid stress and end-of-line testing, and dynamic scenario emulation, advancing fuel cell development by enhancing experimental investigations during transient operation. • Nonlinear gas decoupling control based on exact input–output linearization. • Precise imposition of decoupled cathode pressure and flow trajectories. • Experimental validation on a commercially available fuel cell testbed. • Highly dynamic validation test cycles performed with a working single cell. • Improved repeatability of transient tests and cell diagnostic experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207