MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414715597 · doi:10.1080/01676830.2025.2566458

Eyelid and conjunctiva sparing exenteration followed by microvascular free flap reconstruction – report of two cases

2025· article· en· W4414715597 on OpenAlex
Judy Gaffar, André Chollet, Elie Boghossian, Vijayabalan Balasingam, Pascal Lavergne, Evan Kalin-Hajdu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrbit · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEyelidConjunctivaFree flapOrbit (dynamics)MicrosurgeryFree flap reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eyelid and conjunctiva sparing exenteration (ECSE) allows for the extirpation of pathologies that lie deep within the orbit without disrupting the anatomy of the eyelids. Despite the cosmetic benefits of maintaining the eyelids, few cases of ECSE have been reported, and reconstruction following the procedure has only been detailed in the form of primary closure or a temporalis muscle transfer. The authors present two patients with deep orbital pathologies that extended into the intracranial space. Each patient underwent an extended ECSE followed by reconstruction with a microvascular free flap. The combination of ECSE plus microvascular free flap reconstruction offers an alternative approach to previously published techniques and may improve esthetic outcomes when exenteration is required for deep orbital pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it