MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414717192 · doi:10.59181/jnh.2025.21.101

Lifelong Education Healing Program from Postmodernism : A Comparative Case Study between Korea and Canada

2025· article· en· W4414717192 on OpenAlex
Eun Park

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Natural Healing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostmodernismComparative caseLifelong learningComparative researchQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구는 포스트모더니즘 교육철학을 분석틀로 하여 한국과 캐나다의 평생교육 치유프로그램을 비교·분석하고, 평생교육의 새로운 발전 방향을 모색하고자 하였다. 연구방법으로는 문헌연 구와 비교사례연구를 활용하였으며, 한국에서는 예술치유와 숲치 유 중심의 프로그램을, 캐나다에서는 다문화주의와 공동체 기반 학습 프로그램을 분석 대상으로 삼았다. 분석 결과, 두 나라의 프로그램 모두 학습자의 정서적 안정과 성장을 촉진하는 공통점 을 지녔으나, 한국은 개인적 치유 중심, 캐나다는 공동체적 치유 와 사회적 통합 중심이라는 차이를 나타냈다. 이러한 결과는 한 국의 평생교육이 앞으로 치유적 기능을 강화하고 공동체적 포용 성을 확대하는 방향으로 발전해야 함을 보여주며, 포스트모더니 즘 교육철학이 실제 현장에 반영될 수 있는 실천적 가능성을 확 인하는 데 학문적 의의를 가진다. 다만 본 연구는 문헌 및 사례 분석에 국한되어 실증자료를 포함하지 못한 한계가 있으며, 향후 연구에서는 다양한 국가를 대상으로 양적·질적 연구를 병행하여 평생교육의 치유적 효과를 구체적으로 검증할 필요가 있다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it