MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414734514 · doi:10.1017/9783959941518.014

Damascus, Friday, 27 April

2021· other· en· W4414734514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Conflict Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPashaFountainFront (military)HaremWhite (mutation)DreamQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As if from a dream from the Thousand and One Nights , I shall remember entering Pasha Abdullah's house on this spring morning. An old quarter of the rich and the lords with a grim appearance. Dark walls full of mystery and menace. A fortress door, then small thick circuitous winding corridors, as if to be less penetrable. But suddenly, delightful gardens between fine colonnades of white marble, an Eden with flowering trees in the midst of a wonderful old oriental setting. The pasha's janissary walks in front of me through the silent house. From time to time, as etiquette demands, he utters a loud cry of alarm in front of me in order to keep the women of the harem hidden. Repeating this dire warning in the middle of the empty garden leaves me feeling sacrilegious as I enter some forbidden fairy kingdom. Without thinking, I look around for mysterious houris. The pasha welcomes me in a room worthy of Aladdin. Following the Damascene style, it is composed of two distinct parts on different levels: the first is the entrance including only a fountain in a huge wonderful marble basin; and the second, further back, two or three steps higher, furnished with couches and cushions which in this elevated position look like thrones. The flooring is of marble mosaics. On the walls, finer mosaics, mixed with mother of pearl, alternate with panels of the tilework which has not been produced since Tamerlane made his destructive way through. Each panel is framed by arabesques of rare design and depicts a spray of fanciful flowers breaking free from some strange vase with a long slender neck. The ceilings are very high; they are coloured and gilded, with wheel-windows and domes and are of an unimaginable geometrical intricacy, an extravagant kaleidoscopic fantasy. They are moreover delightfully faded and kept in the shadows high above everything by means of cleverly placed lighting rising from below. Wall niches contain hookahs sparkling with precious stones and silver ewers, covered in large turquoises like drops of blue milk. On the cushions and couches, there are matchless antique velvets and the kinds of embroidery which are scarcely to be found anymore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6300.358

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth and Conflict StudiesFrench-language works237,207