MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414737045 · doi:10.64388/irev9i3-1710452-2214

Sustainability and Performance of Natural Adhesives in Humid Tropical Climates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Case Evidence from Nigeria

2025· review· en· W4414737045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIconic Research and Engineering Journals · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative humiditySustainabilityAdhesiveGum arabicGuar gumShear strength (soil)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gum arabic, cassava starch, chitosan, lignin are natural adhesives that use renewable sources, and are gaining momentum as substitutes to synthetic adhesives in response to environmental concerns. Yet, to be effective in humid tropical climates, which are characterised by high relative humidity (>80%), high temperatures (25-35 C) and moisture, their effectiveness needs to be systematically tested. This is a review of evidence on performance measurements (bond strength, durability) and sustainability (environmental impact, economic viability), including meta-analysis and a case study of Nigeria. Following PRISMA 2020, searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online between January 1990 and August 2025. Eligibility Studies on natural adhesives in humid/tropical conditions that have quantitative results. Records were screened by two reviewers (kappa=0.87); quality determined with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane RoB 2. Random-effects models in R (metafor package) were employed in the meta-analysis of shear strength with subgroup analyses performed according to adhesive type and GRADE certainty. Out of 1,456 records, 78 studies have been included (45 old, 33 new). A meta-analysis (n=22 studies, 612 samples) provided a result as to dry shear strength of 3.58 MPa (95% CI: 2.45-4.71; I 2=73, p<0.001) and wet shear of 1.78 MPa (95% CI: 1.05-2.51; I 2=77, p<0.001). Gum arabic was tough (wet: 1.62 MPa), cassava starch greater dry strength (4.25 MPa). Sustainability: 35-65% lower CO2 emissions. Nigerian cases: gum arabic in particleboards resisted 90% RH. Natural adhesives would work reasonably well in moist tropics with modifications, and would have sustainability advantages. Policy suggestions: support local manufacture in Nigeria to adapt to climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it